Researcher says Australia should be rated third on Olympic Games medal tally

Latest News

Last lap of honour for Jack Brabham24-Oct-2012

One last lap of honour for Australian motorsport legend Sir Jack Brabham as he battles failing h..

Anthony Mundine echoes the Ku Klux Klan: Mansell19-Oct-2012

Daniel Geale & Anthony Mundine (pictured) for press conference announcing their world t..

Football gave Sudanese girl a chance19-Oct-2012

TERESA Yuol's parents died in Sudan when she was a child. She only had six years of schooling und..

Read more news
News Archive

Featured Job

No items found.

Researcher says Australia should be rated third on Olympic Games medal tally

16-Aug-2012

Australia's Olympic gold medal count may have failed to meet expectations but statisticians have shifted the posts and upgraded our finishing place.

 

Sally-Pearson

 

Image: Worth its weight in gol: Australia's Sally Pearson poses with her gold medal for the 100m hurdles in London. Source: Ben Curtis / AP

When measured against key social factors including population and wealth, researchers at Britain's University of Salford put Australia third in the Games placings.

Following 16 days of competition, Australia finished the London Olympics in 10th place on the medal table with seven gold, 16 silver and 12 bronze.

With pre-Games hopes of a top-five finish, the 35 medals were an underwhelming outcome.

Not according to economics Professor David Forrest from Salford, who said that in line with his calculations, Australia should have expected just 12 medals.

"We thought it would be worthwhile to determine how countries should perform as if they were all effectively starting from scratch, with no history of competing in the Olympic Games but with all other factors being considered," Prof Forrest said in a statement.

"These include Gross Domestic Product; population; government spending on recreation; the impact of hosting the next or next-but-one Olympics; and the effect of current and former communist political systems.

"The benchmark table shows that, far from performing badly, Australia punched well above its weight in this Olympics.

"The team's London 2012 collection of 35 medals may be the lowest for 20 years but this just emphasises how incredibly well Australia has done in Olympic competition - a weighted medal total of 12 is where they should typically be."

The ranking system pushes Australia well ahead of the United States and China, which took out first and second places respectively on the official medal tally.

New Zealand also sees a promotion on the statistical medal scale, from its official 15th place, to seventh.

AAP



 

Comment

No Very




Captcha Image

 

Upcoming Events

No events found. See more events
Submit an Event

Subscribe

Keep Up-to-date with Sport Support, subscribe to our RSS feed to be notified of all our latest news blog events and more .

Subscribe to RSS feed 
What is RSS feed?

Tip of The Day

It is worth investing the time in exercise for the mental boost you will receive.
read more
Enrol now for 2011 for study at Southern Cross University